E’ gennaio è stato reso pubblico un report del Defense Science Board del Dipartimento della Difesa americano.
Si tratta della seconda parte di un documento sulla "Capability Surprise" (la prima parte era stata pubblicata a settembre dello scorso anno).
Entrambi i documenti sono piuttosto interessanti. A pagina 66 leggo:
Specifically we recommend that the Secretary task both the Under Secretaries of Defense for Policy and Intelligence, and the Joint Staff, working with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, to create a tiger team to lay out courses of action and a way ahead for establishing a standing strategic surprise/deception entity."
Si tratta della seconda parte di un documento sulla "Capability Surprise" (la prima parte era stata pubblicata a settembre dello scorso anno).
Entrambi i documenti sono piuttosto interessanti. A pagina 66 leggo:
"
Creating strategic surprise is especially challenging (…). this study concludes that creating strategic and operational surpise will remain key ingredients for success on both the battlefield and the political front. As result we recommend that the Secretary of Defense create a capability for developing strategic surprise.Specifically we recommend that the Secretary task both the Under Secretaries of Defense for Policy and Intelligence, and the Joint Staff, working with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, to create a tiger team to lay out courses of action and a way ahead for establishing a standing strategic surprise/deception entity."